Snapshot of blader/humanizer: 36.4k★, Python, AI Tools. Agent skill that removes signs of AI-generated writing from text
Snapshot summary built from the project's own GitHub metadata — there's no written TopGit review yet. The page will update automatically when a full review is published.
WHY NO REVIEW YET
TopGit writes full reviews for the most-starred, most-requested repositories. This page is a snapshot until then — see the READ ME tab for the original README in full.
Humanizer rewrites text that sounds AI-generated while keeping the writer's facts, meaning, and voice. The skill is plain Markdown and works in any agent that supports skills.
Run the installed skill with /humanizer:humanizer.
The plugin links skills/humanizer/SKILL.md to the root SKILL.md. This lets Claude Desktop and older plugin loaders find the skill without creating a second prompt.
Claude Desktop upload
Download humanizer-skill.zip from the latest release when you install or replace Humanizer through the Claude Desktop GUI.
Do not use GitHub's Code > Download ZIP archive for this. The source archive contains the plugin's internal symbolic link, which Claude Desktop rejects. The release package contains one regular file at humanizer/SKILL.md.
Manual
You can also place SKILL.md in any agent's skill folder.
Provide a writing sample when you want Humanizer to match your style:
/humanizer
Here's a sample of my writing for voice matching:
[paste 2-3 paragraphs of your own writing]
Now humanize this text:
[paste AI text to humanize]
Humanizer matches the sample's rhythm, word choice, punctuation, and deliberate quirks.
How it works
Humanizer uses patterns from Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing", maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup.
It drafts a rewrite, checks the draft for remaining AI patterns and changed claims, then writes the final version.
It does not invent facts, names, dates, quotes, or citations. Any added detail must come from the source or the writer.
Wikipedia's main point
"LLMs use statistical algorithms to guess what should come next. The result tends toward the most statistically likely result that applies to the widest variety of cases."
35 patterns with examples
Content patterns
#
Pattern
Before
After
1
Inflated importance and legacy
"marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of..."
"was established in 1989 as part of a wider decentralization"
"protagonist... main character... hero" or "She noted... She noted... She filed..."
Use one name or merge the repeated sentences
12
False from X to Y ranges
"from the Big Bang to dark matter"
List the topics directly
13
Passive voice and missing subjects
"No configuration file needed"
Name the actor when that helps
Style patterns
#
Pattern
Before
After
14
Em/en dashes
"institutions—not the people—yet this continues—"
Cut them: periods, commas, colons, or parentheses
15
Too much bold text
"OKRs, KPIs, BMC"
"OKRs, KPIs, BMC"
16
Lists with bold mini-headings
"Performance: Performance improved"
Use prose when a list adds no value
17
Title case in headings
"Strategic Negotiations And Partnerships"
"Strategic negotiations and partnerships"
18
Emojis
"🚀 Launch Phase: 💡 Key Insight:"
Remove emojis
19
Curly quotes
said “the project”
said "the project"
26
Too many hyphenated word pairs
“cross-functional, data-driven, client-facing”
Keep only the hyphens grammar needs
27
A fake deeper truth
"At its core, what matters is..."
State the point directly
28
Announcing the next point
"Let's dive in", or "one thing that bit me"
Start with the content
29
A heading repeated below itself
"## Performance" + "Speed matters."
Let the heading do the work
30
Writing about the old version
"This function was added to replace..."
Describe what it does now
31
Forced punchlines and fragments
"It had no preference. No prior. No nostalgia."
Use natural sentence lengths and specific claims
32
Formulaic sayings
"Symmetry is the language of trust"
State the specific claim
33
Fake-candid openings
"Honestly? It depends..."
State the answer directly
34
Answering objections no one raised
"This isn't mainly about prompt length..."
Remove the unsupported defense and keep any real claim
35
Rejecting fake alternatives
"A tempting option would be to..., but"
Remove the fake option and keep real choices
Chatbot patterns
#
Pattern
Before
After
20
Chatbot text left in the answer
"I hope this helps! Let me know if..."
Remove it
21
Knowledge-limit disclaimers and guesses
"While details are limited in available sources..."
State what is known or remove the claim
22
Overly agreeable tone
"Great question! You're absolutely right!"
Answer directly
Filler and hedging
#
Pattern
Before
After
23
Filler phrases
"In order to", "Due to the fact that"
"To", "Because"
24
Too many qualifiers
"could potentially possibly"
"may"
25
Generic positive endings
"The future looks bright"
End with a fact or a sourced plan
Full example
The example includes details that a real writer would provide, such as the month and neighborhood. Humanizer must ask for missing details instead of inventing them.
Before (AI-sounding):
I recently spent five unforgettable days in Lisbon, and let me tell you — this city completely stole my heart. From the moment I arrived, I knew I was somewhere truly special.
Nestled along the banks of the Tagus River, Lisbon stands as a vibrant testament to Portugal's enduring spirit, where rich history and modern energy intertwine at every turn. Yes, the famous hills are challenging — my legs certainly felt it! — but every climb rewards you with breathtaking, panoramic views that make it all worthwhile.
No trip would be complete without riding the iconic Tram 28, winding through the city's most historic neighborhoods. And the food? Simply divine. The original pastéis de nata at Pastéis de Belém are a beloved national treasure, and savoring one still warm was a moment I will never forget.
But what truly makes Lisbon special isn't just the sights — it's the feeling. Wander a few steps off the main squares and you'll discover a quieter, more authentic side: sun-drenched alleys, charming tiled facades, and friendly locals going about their daily lives, inviting you to slow down and savor every moment.
Of course, the must-see São Jorge Castle offers stunning views over the rooftops below. The queues can be long, but the experience is absolutely worth it for any history buff or curious traveler.
Would I go back? Absolutely. Lisbon isn't just a place to visit — it's a place to fall in love with, again and again. If you're dreaming of your next getaway, this is one destination that promises memories to last a lifetime. ✨
After:
I spent five days in Lisbon last October and still have mixed feelings about it. Beautiful, yes. Also harder on the knees than anyone warned me.
The hills are the whole story and somehow never make the brochures. My hotel was up in Alfama, which photographs beautifully and translates, in practice, to climbing what felt like a six-story staircase every time I wanted coffee. By the second day my calves had opinions. I started planning each walk around which way was downhill, which is a strange way to see a city but probably an honest one.
Everyone says to ride Tram 28, so I did, wedged against a stranger's backpack for forty minutes while three tour groups filmed the same corner. I would walk the route next time, or go before breakfast. The custard tarts, though, earn the fuss. I had one at a plain little place in Graça, still warm, and for about thirty seconds I understood why people build trips around pastry.
What I did not expect was how quiet the city gets away from the main squares. Two blocks uphill from any plaza it turns into laundry lines, chipped tile, open windows, and old men watching football with the sound turned up. That is the Lisbon I keep thinking about, not the castle.
The castle is fine. The view is great, the queue is long, and I spent more time shuffling toward the entrance than looking at anything once I got inside. If I had only two days, I would trade it for an afternoon of getting lost.
I would go back, but in spring and with better shoes. Lisbon does not bend over backward to make things easy for you. I think I liked that, even when my legs disagreed.
Sources
Wikipedia: Signs of AI writing - Main source
WikiProject AI Cleanup - Maintains the source page
Version history
2.11.1 - Added a Claude Desktop-ready release package with one regular humanizer/SKILL.md file. GitHub's source archive still keeps the plugin symlink (fixes #224). No change to the 35 patterns.
2.11.0 - Rewrote all repo guidance, descriptions, checks, and skill instructions in Plain Language. Kept all 35 patterns and their behavior.
2.10.2 - Added the standard skills/humanizer/ plugin path for Claude Desktop and older loaders. The path links to the root skill, so there is still one prompt (fixes #202).
2.10.1 - Added figurative uses of gate, gated, and gating to §7. Kept real technical uses, such as feature gating and CI quality gates.
2.10.0 - Added patterns #34 and #35 for old drafting ideas left in final text. Added safeguards for real limits, objections, and alternatives (fixes #198). Also improved §24 and the final rewrite step. 35 patterns total.
2.9.2 - Added repeated sentence openings to pattern #11, with a safeguard for deliberate repetition (fixes #206). Expanded §28 to cover casual announcements. 33 patterns total.
2.9.1 - Improved installation and package checks. Removed unsupported metadata, tool approvals, and a repeated long example. 33 patterns total.
2.9.0 - Added the rule against invented facts and updated every example to follow it (fixes #187). Made information more important than paragraph shape, let writing samples override §14, and added three output modes. 33 patterns total.
2.8.3 - Moved the version to metadata.version for Agent Skills compatibility. 33 patterns total.
2.8.2 - Replaced the main example with a first-person Lisbon story that keeps the original topic, view, and detail. 33 patterns total.
2.8.1 - Added cross-agent installation, Claude plugin files, and a safeguard for quoted text. 33 patterns total.
2.8.0 - Added patterns #31-33 and expanded pattern #20 to catch chatbot offers. 33 patterns total.
2.7.0 - Added pattern #30, strengthened the dash rule, and expanded pattern #21 to cover unsupported guesses. 30 patterns total.
2.6.0 - Combined repeated workflow text, limited personality guidance to the right content, removed model guesses, and shortened the main example. 29 patterns total.
The most recent commit recorded on blader/humanizer was 3 days ago, based on the GitHub push timestamp. The repository has 3.2k forks — one of the better signals of community interest.
How does blader/humanizer compare to other AI Tools projects?
blader/humanizer is tracked by TopGit in the AI Tools category, with 36.4k GitHub stars and written in Python. Browse the AI Tools topic page on TopGit to compare it against similar projects by stars and activity.
How many stars does blader/humanizer have?
blader/humanizer has 36.4k GitHub stars — refresh the page for the live number, or check github.com/blader/humanizer. TopGit mirrors GitHub's count but does not claim minute-by-minute accuracy.
Is blader/humanizer open source?
Yes — blader/humanizer ships under the MIT license, which makes its source code freely readable (and, depending on license terms, forkable and reusable). Source: github.com/blader/humanizer.
What is blader/humanizer?
blader/humanizer (blader/humanizer) is a Python project on GitHub. From the project's own README: Agent skill that removes signs of AI-generated writing from text
Where do I read more about blader/humanizer?
This TopGit page is a snapshot — the READ ME tab shows the project's own README content (links stripped, images preserved). The GitHub repository at github.com/blader/humanizer is the definitive source.
Read full README in the tab above.
Is humanizer worth your time?
ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity can all read this page. Ask one of them what it makes of humanizer.